彩神彩票必赚方案-彩神彩票玩法

来源：彩神彩票娱乐2023-09-04 17:48

彩神彩票必赚方案

浙江启动全球大招商年今年预计超200个团组出境******

　　中新网杭州1月10日电(记者黄慧)于经济大省浙江而言，新的一年如何推动高质量使用外资和招商工作开好局、起好步？1月9日，“投资浙里”全球大招商年启动仪式在杭州举行。记者现场获悉，今年，浙江预计将有超200个团组赴境外开展招商活动。

　　浙江省商务厅厅长韩杰表示，当前，浙江使用外资工作面临重要战略机遇期。今年，浙江将进一步实施“8+4+1”政策体系，制定新一轮力度更强、更加务实有效的稳外资政策举措。

　　事实上，自疫情政策优化调整以来，浙江各地已全面掀起全球大招商工作热潮。“投资浙里”全球大招商年的启动，将会进一步点燃这股热潮。

　　韩杰说，要围绕浙江“415X”先进制造业集群建设，以杭州获批国家服务业扩大开放综合试点为契机，坚持高质量制造业项目优先、大项目优先、引领性项目优先，提升外资项目招引质量；要全方位拓展全球大招商方式方法，积极开展境外招商、基金招商、中介招商、专业化公司招商，推动侨商、浙商回归投资。

　　浙江省商务厅副厅长石琪琪介绍，围绕打造高质量外资集聚地的总目标，“投资浙里”全球大招商年的主要内涵是围绕“一个目标” 、做到“两个聚焦”、推动“三个更加” 、落实“四个重大” 。

　　据悉，“投资浙里”全球大招商年主要聚焦高端外资产业和重大外资项目，力争推动外资增长更加平稳，外资结构更加合理，营商环境更加优化。

　　例如，立足产业资源优势，浙江将筛选重点领域细分赛道，着力招引一批高质量、高科技、高环保、高端化的项目，大投资、大规模、大牵引的项目，世界500强、跨国公司地区总部、隐形冠军等企业及外资研发机构等。

　　站在新的起点，浙江多地已做好规划，蓄势待发。

　　现场，杭州投资促进局副局长蔡儒杰表示，杭州将勇当全球大招商年的开路先锋，奋力做好“氛围营造”“渠道拓展”“外资转型”等五篇文章。

　　如其所言，杭州一季度将组织开展好“杭州·全球招商季”活动，以欧洲、日韩、港澳为重点地区，市区联动举办重点招商活动不少于30场，同时开通境外招商审批“绿色通道” ，组织赴境外招商团组不少于30个。该市还将精准对接世界500强、行业头部企业，实现重点外资企业走访全覆盖。

　　再如嘉兴，该市目前已组织出访团组4个，达成投资意向项目5个。值得一提的是，距离嘉兴市日本招商团组回国仅12天，日本某精细化工龙头企业便派出高级别代表团来嘉兴回访，达成总投资1亿美元的合作项目。

　　嘉兴市商务局党委委员、嘉兴市贸促会副会长徐伟强介绍，嘉兴围绕“135”主导产业排定了71个出境招商团组，其中一季度24个，将充分发挥嘉兴国际产业合作园数量多、覆盖广的优势，主攻德国、日本、美国、新加坡、以色列等发达经济体。

　　数据显示，2022年1月-11月，浙江实际使用外资182.1亿美元，同比增长11.4%，预计全年实际使用外资达190亿美元，其中高技术产业实际使用外资占比近50% 。(完)

搜索

复制

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.